sex and other work outside the responsible pharmacist

Oct 13, 2025 by orovajewels.com 23 views

The Opinion of the Pharmacist in Charge of the Pharmacy in Binjai City towards PMK No.31 of 2016

Background of the Study

Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia (PMK) No.31 of 2016 is a significant amendment to PMK No.889 of 2011, which regulates registration, practice permit, and work permit for pharmacy. This regulation brings a number of new provisions that have an impact on the pharmacist profession, especially for pharmacists in charge of pharmacies in the City of Binjai. The study aims to explore the pharmacist's opinion regarding the application of the regulation and understand the implications caused.

Methodology

The study was conducted by a descriptive cross-sectional method, which includes surveys in all pharmacies in the city of Binjai. A total of 49 pharmacists in charge of the pharmacy participated in this study, providing valuable insights through questionnaires that were distributed directly and online. The data collected was then analyzed using the Chi-Square test with SPSS version 21 to determine the relationship between the characteristics of their respondents and their opinions.

Results

The results showed that the majority of respondents, namely 45 out of 49 people (91.8%), supported the application of PMK No.31 of 2016. This finding reflects that the regulation was well received by Pharmacists in the City of Binjai. In addition, further analysis through the Chi-Square test shows a significant relationship between age characteristics, graduation year, work experience, and income with the opinions of respondents (p <0.05). However, the characteristics of sex and other work outside the responsible pharmacist do not show a significant relationship (P> 0.05).

Discussion

From these results, we can conclude that pharmacists in Binjai City generally support the application of PMK No.31 of 2016, showing a high level of revenue to changes in regulation. This support can be rooted in hopes of improving pharmaceutical practice standards and protection of their professions. Furthermore, strong support from the responsible pharmacist can be a positive indicator for the implementation of the regulation, as well as being the basis for the development of better health policies in the future.

Implications

With a good collaboration and understanding between pharmacists, it is hoped that the implementation of PMK No.31 of 2016 can run effectively and provide optimal benefits for the community and the pharmaceutical profession itself. The study's findings can be used as a reference for policymakers and stakeholders to develop better health policies and regulations that support the growth and development of the pharmaceutical profession.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the study found that pharmacists in Binjai City generally support the application of PMK No.31 of 2016. The study's findings highlight the importance of collaboration and understanding between pharmacists and policymakers to ensure the effective implementation of the regulation and the development of better health policies.

Limitations

The study has some limitations, including the small sample size and the limited scope of the study. Future studies can build on this study by exploring the opinions of pharmacists in other cities and regions, as well as examining the impact of the regulation on the pharmaceutical profession and the community.

Future Research Directions

Future research can explore the following directions:

Examining the impact of the regulation on the pharmaceutical profession and the community
Investigating the opinions of pharmacists in other cities and regions
Developing a more comprehensive understanding of the implications of the regulation on the pharmaceutical profession and the community

By exploring these research directions, we can gain a deeper understanding of the implications of PMK No.31 of 2016 and develop better health policies and regulations that support the growth and development of the pharmaceutical profession.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the Opinion of the Pharmacist in Charge of the Pharmacy in Binjai City towards PMK No.31 of 2016

Q: What is PMK No.31 of 2016?

A: PMK No.31 of 2016 is a regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia that amends PMK No.889 of 2011, which regulates registration, practice permit, and work permit for pharmacy.

Q: What is the purpose of PMK No.31 of 2016?

A: The purpose of PMK No.31 of 2016 is to improve the quality of pharmaceutical practice and protect the profession of pharmacists in Indonesia.

Q: What are the key provisions of PMK No.31 of 2016?

A: The key provisions of PMK No.31 of 2016 include:

Registration of pharmacists and pharmacies
Practice permit for pharmacists
Work permit for pharmacists
Quality control of pharmaceutical products
Protection of the profession of pharmacists

Q: What is the significance of the study on the opinion of pharmacists in Binjai City towards PMK No.31 of 2016?

A: The study is significant because it provides insights into the opinions of pharmacists in Binjai City towards PMK No.31 of 2016, which can inform policymakers and stakeholders about the effectiveness of the regulation.

Q: What are the findings of the study?

A: The study found that the majority of pharmacists in Binjai City (91.8%) supported the application of PMK No.31 of 2016. The study also found a significant relationship between age characteristics, graduation year, work experience, and income with the opinions of respondents.

Q: What are the implications of the study?

A: The study's findings highlight the importance of collaboration and understanding between pharmacists and policymakers to ensure the effective implementation of the regulation and the development of better health policies.

Q: What are the limitations of the study?

A: The study has some limitations, including the small sample size and the limited scope of the study.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: Future research can explore the following directions:

Examining the impact of the regulation on the pharmaceutical profession and the community
Investigating the opinions of pharmacists in other cities and regions
Developing a more comprehensive understanding of the implications of the regulation on the pharmaceutical profession and the community

Q: What are the recommendations for policymakers and stakeholders?

A: The study's findings recommend that policymakers and stakeholders should:

Collaborate with pharmacists to ensure the effective implementation of the regulation
Develop better health policies and regulations that support the growth and development of the pharmaceutical profession
Conduct further research to explore the impact of the regulation on the pharmaceutical profession and the community.