The Importance of Debt Policy in Manufacturing Companies

Oct 13, 2025 by orovajewels.com 57 views

Analysis of the Effect of Profitability, Asset Structure, Free Cash Flow, and Company Size on Debt Policy with Company Value as a Moderation Variable in Manufacturing Companies Listed on the IDX 2016-2021

Introduction

In the business world, especially in the manufacturing sector, companies often face challenges in financial management and strategic decision making related to debt policy. This study aims to analyze the effect of profitability, asset structure, free cash flow, and company size on debt policy, with company value as a moderation variable. This study was conducted on 51 companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) during the 2016 to 2021 period, with data analysis using multiple linear regression methods through Stata software.

The Importance of Debt Policy in Manufacturing Companies

Debt policy is a crucial aspect of financial management in manufacturing companies. It involves the use of debt financing to fund business operations, expansion, and investment. A well-managed debt policy can help companies to achieve their financial goals, while an poorly managed debt policy can lead to financial distress and even bankruptcy. Therefore, it is essential to understand the factors that influence debt policy in manufacturing companies.

Profitability and Debt Policy

One important finding of this study shows that profitability has a positive and significant influence on debt policy. This can be explained by the fact that more profitable companies tend to have a greater capacity to repay debt. When companies make high profits, they feel more confident to owe, making it easier for them to obtain the funding needed for expansion and investment. This is because profitable companies have a higher creditworthiness, which makes them more attractive to lenders.

Asset Structure and Debt Policy

This study also found that asset structure has a positive and significant influence on debt policy. Companies with a more solid asset structure can more easily get loans because the creditor sees the assets as collateral. Strong assets can provide confidence to the lender that the company is able to fulfill its debt obligations. Therefore, companies with good asset structures are more likely to implement aggressive debt policies. This is because asset structure provides a sense of security for lenders, making it easier for companies to access debt financing.

Free Cash Flow and Debt Policy

Furthermore, free cash flow is also proven to have a positive and significant influence on debt policy. High free cash flow shows that the company has enough liquidity to fund investment or pay debts without having to rely on new equity. This gives the company the freedom to take more debt to increase the scale of the business or fund a new project, which in turn can increase profitability. This is because free cash flow provides companies with the flexibility to manage their debt obligations and make strategic investments.

Company Size and Debt Policy

Although the company's size shows a positive effect on debt policy, the results of the study recorded an insignificant effect. This may be caused by various factors, including the ability of large companies to attract investors and get capital without having to depend on debt. Large companies often have better access to the capital market and can meet their funding needs without increasing debt. This is because large companies have a higher credit rating and are more attractive to investors, making it easier for them to access debt financing.

The Role of Company Value as a Moderation Variable

The results of further analysis show that the company's value can function as a moderation variable in the relationship between these factors and debt policy. High company value can increase the effect of profitability, asset structure, free cash flow, and company size on debt policy. In other words, when a company has good value in the eyes of the market, this can strengthen their position in getting better and bigger debt. This is because company value provides a sense of security and confidence for lenders, making it easier for companies to access debt financing.

Conclusion

From the results of this study, it can be concluded that profitability, asset structure, and free cash flow significantly affect the debt policy of manufacturing companies listed on the IDX. Although the company's size has a positive influence, the effect is not significant. In addition, company value is proven to play an important role as a moderation in the relationship between these factors and debt policy. This study provides valuable insight for company managers in formulating appropriate financial management strategies, as well as contributing to the development of theory in the company's finances.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations can be made:

Companies should focus on improving their profitability, asset structure, and free cash flow to increase their debt capacity.
Companies should also focus on increasing their company value to strengthen their position in getting better and bigger debt.
Company managers should consider the company's size and debt policy when making strategic decisions.
Further research is needed to explore the relationship between company value and debt policy in other industries.

Limitations of the Study

This study has several limitations, including:

The study was conducted on a sample of 51 companies listed on the IDX, which may not be representative of all manufacturing companies in Indonesia.
The study used multiple linear regression methods, which may not be the most appropriate method for analyzing the relationship between company value and debt policy.
The study did not consider other factors that may influence debt policy, such as industry trends and market conditions.

Future Research Directions

Future research should focus on exploring the relationship between company value and debt policy in other industries, as well as considering other factors that may influence debt policy. Additionally, further research is needed to explore the impact of company value on debt policy in different economic conditions.
Q&A: Analysis of the Effect of Profitability, Asset Structure, Free Cash Flow, and Company Size on Debt Policy with Company Value as a Moderation Variable in Manufacturing Companies Listed on the IDX 2016-2021

Q: What is the main objective of this study?

A: The main objective of this study is to analyze the effect of profitability, asset structure, free cash flow, and company size on debt policy, with company value as a moderation variable in manufacturing companies listed on the IDX 2016-2021.

Q: What are the key findings of this study?

A: The key findings of this study are:

Profitability has a positive and significant influence on debt policy.
Asset structure has a positive and significant influence on debt policy.
Free cash flow has a positive and significant influence on debt policy.
Company size has a positive but insignificant influence on debt policy.
Company value plays an important role as a moderation variable in the relationship between these factors and debt policy.

Q: What are the implications of this study for company managers?

A: The implications of this study for company managers are:

Companies should focus on improving their profitability, asset structure, and free cash flow to increase their debt capacity.
Companies should also focus on increasing their company value to strengthen their position in getting better and bigger debt.
Company managers should consider the company's size and debt policy when making strategic decisions.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: The limitations of this study are:

The study was conducted on a sample of 51 companies listed on the IDX, which may not be representative of all manufacturing companies in Indonesia.
The study used multiple linear regression methods, which may not be the most appropriate method for analyzing the relationship between company value and debt policy.
The study did not consider other factors that may influence debt policy, such as industry trends and market conditions.

Q: What are the future research directions for this study?

A: The future research directions for this study are:

Exploring the relationship between company value and debt policy in other industries.
Considering other factors that may influence debt policy, such as industry trends and market conditions.
Analyzing the impact of company value on debt policy in different economic conditions.

Q: What are the practical implications of this study for financial managers?

A: The practical implications of this study for financial managers are:

Financial managers should consider the company's profitability, asset structure, and free cash flow when making decisions about debt policy.
Financial managers should also consider the company's size and debt policy when making strategic decisions.
Financial managers should focus on increasing the company's value to strengthen its position in getting better and bigger debt.

Q: What are the theoretical implications of this study for financial theory?

A: The theoretical implications of this study for financial theory are:

The study provides evidence that company value plays an important role as a moderation variable in the relationship between profitability, asset structure, free cash flow, and debt policy.
The study provides evidence that company size has a positive but insignificant influence on debt policy.
The study provides evidence that profitability, asset structure, and free cash flow have a significant influence on debt policy.

Q: What are the policy implications of this study for regulatory bodies?

A: The policy implications of this study for regulatory bodies are:

Regulatory bodies should consider the company's profitability, asset structure, and free cash flow when making decisions about debt policy.
Regulatory bodies should also consider the company's size and debt policy when making strategic decisions.
Regulatory bodies should focus on increasing the company's value to strengthen its position in getting better and bigger debt.