The Importance of Good Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility

Oct 13, 2025 by orovajewels.com 139 views

The Effect of Good Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility on Aggressive Tax Actions: Studies on Manufacturing Companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange Period 2011-2013

Introduction

In recent years, the issue of aggressive tax actions has become a significant concern for governments and regulatory bodies worldwide. Aggressive tax actions refer to the use of tax avoidance strategies by companies to minimize their tax liabilities, often at the expense of the government and other stakeholders. In Indonesia, the issue of aggressive tax actions is particularly relevant, given the country's large and growing economy, as well as its complex tax system.

This study aims to examine the effect of good corporate governance (GCG) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) on aggressive tax actions in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) during the 2011-2013 period. The study uses a descriptive approach with secondary data obtained through the study of company documents, literature, and sources of information related to GCG and CSR disclosure.

The Importance of Good Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility

Good corporate governance (GCG) refers to the practices and processes that a company uses to ensure that its operations are conducted in a transparent, accountable, and responsible manner. GCG is essential for building trust and confidence among stakeholders, including investors, customers, employees, and the wider community. In the context of tax, GCG is critical in ensuring that companies comply with tax laws and regulations, and that they do not engage in aggressive tax actions.

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) refers to the voluntary actions that a company takes to benefit society and the environment. CSR is an important aspect of GCG, as it reflects a company's commitment to social and environmental responsibility. CSR can take many forms, including philanthropy, community development, and environmental sustainability.

The Relationship Between GCG, CSR, and Aggressive Tax Actions

The study found that there was a significant relationship between the size of the Board of Commissioners, the size of the Board of Directors, the number of audit committees, and CSR with aggressive tax actions in manufacturing companies listed on the IDX. The results showed that the four variables together have an influence on the company's aggressive tax behavior.

Further Analysis

The study found that the size of the Board of Commissioners and Board of Directors had a significant impact on aggressive tax actions. The greater the size of the Board of Commissioners and Board of Directors, the lower the possibility of the company to take aggressive tax action. This may be caused by increasing supervision and control over company management, thereby reducing opportunities for tax avoidance.

The study also found that the existence of an independent and competent audit committee within the company can improve the quality of internal and external audit, which in turn can reduce aggressive tax action.

Finally, the study found that companies that run CSR tend to have a good reputation in the eyes of the public and stakeholders. To maintain a reputation, companies may tend to avoid aggressive tax behavior that can harm the image and trust of the public.

Challenges and Opportunities

Although this research shows a significant relationship, keep in mind that the implementation of GCG and CSR in Indonesia still has several challenges, such as lack of awareness and commitment of stakeholders. However, the results of this study also show opportunities to improve corporate governance and more responsible tax behavior.

Suggestion

This study has important implications for regulators, investors, and companies themselves. Regulators can consider increasing regulations related to GCG and CSR, as well as encouraging more effective implementation. Investors can use GCG and CSR information as one of the factors in making investment decisions. The company itself can increase the commitment and implementation of GCG and CSR to build stakeholder trust and improve long-term performance.

Conclusion

This study provides empirical evidence of the effect of GCG and CSR on aggressive tax behavior on manufacturing companies in Indonesia. This shows that the application of good GCG and CSR can encourage more responsible tax behavior, thus contributing to a more just and sustainable taxation system.

Recommendations for Future Research

This study has several limitations, including the use of secondary data and the focus on manufacturing companies listed on the IDX. Future research can build on this study by using primary data and examining the effect of GCG and CSR on aggressive tax actions in other industries and countries.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study provides empirical evidence of the effect of GCG and CSR on aggressive tax behavior on manufacturing companies in Indonesia. The study shows that the application of good GCG and CSR can encourage more responsible tax behavior, thus contributing to a more just and sustainable taxation system.

References

[List of references cited in the study]

Appendix

[Appendix containing additional information, such as tables and figures]

Limitations of the Study

Future Research Directions

This study provides several avenues for future research, including:

Examining the effect of GCG and CSR on aggressive tax actions in other industries and countries
Using primary data to examine the relationship between GCG, CSR, and aggressive tax actions
Investigating the impact of GCG and CSR on tax compliance and tax avoidance
Examining the role of stakeholders, including investors, customers, and employees, in promoting GCG and CSR.

Conclusion

Q: What is the main focus of this study?

A: The main focus of this study is to examine the effect of good corporate governance (GCG) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) on aggressive tax actions in manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) during the 2011-2013 period.

Q: What is aggressive tax action?

A: Aggressive tax action refers to the use of tax avoidance strategies by companies to minimize their tax liabilities, often at the expense of the government and other stakeholders.

Q: What is good corporate governance (GCG)?

A: Good corporate governance (GCG) refers to the practices and processes that a company uses to ensure that its operations are conducted in a transparent, accountable, and responsible manner.

Q: What is corporate social responsibility (CSR)?

A: Corporate social responsibility (CSR) refers to the voluntary actions that a company takes to benefit society and the environment.

Q: What are the key findings of this study?

A: The study found that there was a significant relationship between the size of the Board of Commissioners, the size of the Board of Directors, the number of audit committees, and CSR with aggressive tax actions in manufacturing companies listed on the IDX.

Q: What are the implications of this study?

A: The study has important implications for regulators, investors, and companies themselves. Regulators can consider increasing regulations related to GCG and CSR, as well as encouraging more effective implementation. Investors can use GCG and CSR information as one of the factors in making investment decisions. The company itself can increase the commitment and implementation of GCG and CSR to build stakeholder trust and improve long-term performance.

Q: What are the limitations of this study?

A: This study has several limitations, including the use of secondary data and the focus on manufacturing companies listed on the IDX. Future research can build on this study by using primary data and examining the effect of GCG and CSR on aggressive tax actions in other industries and countries.

Q: What are the future research directions?

A: This study provides several avenues for future research, including:

Examining the effect of GCG and CSR on aggressive tax actions in other industries and countries
Using primary data to examine the relationship between GCG, CSR, and aggressive tax actions
Investigating the impact of GCG and CSR on tax compliance and tax avoidance
Examining the role of stakeholders, including investors, customers, and employees, in promoting GCG and CSR.

Q: What are the practical implications of this study?

A: The study has practical implications for companies, regulators, and investors. Companies can increase their commitment and implementation of GCG and CSR to build stakeholder trust and improve long-term performance. Regulators can consider increasing regulations related to GCG and CSR, as well as encouraging more effective implementation. Investors can use GCG and CSR information as one of the factors in making investment decisions.

Q: What are the policy implications of this study?

A: The study has policy implications for governments and regulatory bodies. Governments can consider increasing regulations related to GCG and CSR, as well as encouraging more effective implementation. Regulatory bodies can consider increasing enforcement of tax laws and regulations, as well as promoting GCG and CSR among companies.

Q: What are the future research questions?

A: Some of the future research questions include:

How can GCG and CSR be promoted among companies in Indonesia?
What are the effects of GCG and CSR on tax compliance and tax avoidance?
How can stakeholders, including investors, customers, and employees, be involved in promoting GCG and CSR?
What are the implications of GCG and CSR for company performance and long-term sustainability?